Back to stories

Comments

19 total · 19 loaded

Ranked by HN
I've heard it said that true understanding is demonstrated when someone can explain difficult concepts well. Tao manages to convey complex ideas without making me feel like he is condescending to me. His depth of understanding is unmistakable.

My changes to his list would be s/Geometry/Topology/ and I might have found a place for logic and type theory. I am especially glad he brought to mind Dynamics since that is a field I know I need to pay more attention to.

Great video, we're lucky to have this kind of content so easily and widely available.

esalman1hon HN
I respected Terence Tao but since listening to his "Mathematics in the age of AI" talk, I've become a fan. I have had nobody else explain so succinctly what is the purpose of Mathematical research, why it matters, and why it is so important to preserve the ways we do math. Even more importantly, I feel it resonates so well with every other field AI is taking over.
Yeh; I mean he's still just a dude, not gonna glaze him, but IMO early public ed should really just focus on math and basic physical experiment design for kids

Save specialization in other fields for later in life. Most fields jargon are bolted on top the physical geometry, color gradient, and additive/subtractive behavior in the natural world anyway.

iTokio1hon HN
Numbers

Algebra

Geometry

Probability

Analysis

Dynamics

I loved this talk, but these concepts are like an attempt at dimensional reduction of math research, science, the academics knowledge.

I would have loved to have his thoughts on the mathematical mind, the process, how to reason, infer vs deduct, abstract, prove..

I don’t really know, what are the primitives, essential concepts of math reasoning?

So… numbers, algebra, geometry, probability, analysis, dynamics are not the primitives or essentials ?
I really enjoyed this video (watched it the other day). It makes me feel like it's possible for me to understand the math that I'm currently trying to understand.
pixelpoet3hon HN
At least spell his name correctly, my goodness...

Terence Tao.

Can't believe we missed that. Fixed now. Thanks!
1294763hon HN
[deleted]
It was expected that people without established credibility would be looked down on for using AI, but it's been weird to see people with all the credibility in the world lose it for embracing AI.
orf2hon HN
What credibility has he lost?
To sensible people? None. But the amount of criticism of his work that boils down to "he uses AI" is undeniable.
Can you share some of the criticism? I’ve not seen any from anyone real.
It's weird to believe he's lost credibility.
Tao gives or takes credibility from AI, not the other way around.